Economic Courts
Established to accelerate disputes over capital markets, competition, IP, non-bank finance, and insolvency. The natural destination for most modern commercial disputes.
A practical reference for businesses and shareholders evaluating litigation or arbitration in Egypt: courts, deadlines, arbitration centres, and enforcement. Free public content.
Public content, periodically updated according to the laws in force in Egypt. Does not constitute legal advice tailored to your specific dispute.
Choosing the competent forum is not a procedural detail; it is a strategic decision that determines timeline, cost, and success probability. A concise comparison of the six main routes.
Established to accelerate disputes over capital markets, competition, IP, non-bank finance, and insolvency. The natural destination for most modern commercial disputes.
The traditional route for contractual, tort, and supply/service disputes outside the economic-court jurisdiction.
Administrative Court then the Supreme Administrative Court. Deadlines are strict — delay forfeits the right. A growing forum as the state's investment activity widens.
Does not re-examine facts — reviews application of law. Filing requires precise legal drafting and a cassation-admitted lawyer. Success returns the file to a new appellate circuit.
Cases are not filed directly. Instead, an unconstitutionality defence is raised during other proceedings, and the hearing court refers the file to the Constitutional Court.
Based on Egyptian Arbitration Law 27/1994 and the New York Convention. Choose between CRCICA, ICC, UNCITRAL, or ad-hoc arbitration. The award is final and enforceable in 165 countries.
An internationally recognised independent centre based in Zamalek. Rules modelled on UNCITRAL, working languages Arabic/English/French, and a wide arbitrator network. The default choice for regional disputes.
Suited to disputes with an international dimension and parties from multiple continents. The Court supervises award quality, and its historic reputation strengthens enforcement.
Self-administered arbitration rules usable without an administering institution, suited to large state-related projects. Flexibility in exchange for requiring professional case management.
Arbitration formed by the parties themselves without a centre. Requires detailed agreement on rules and arbitrators — but lower-cost for simpler, lower-value disputes.
A rapid read of facts, documents, party positions, and procedural and substantive risks before any step — this assessment shapes the entire strategy.
Most disputes admit a negotiated resolution — even after litigation begins. Negotiation runs in parallel with judicial preparation, not as a substitute for it.
Precautionary attachment, performance orders, travel ban in applicable cases — protect your right before judgment. Filed by urgent request with strong documentation.
Precise statement of claim, ordered document bundles, expert requests where needed, and correct-circuit selection — good preparation settles long hearings.
Expert technical reports often decide commercial disputes — attending experts, cross-questioning, and filing targeted requests shape the court's view.
After judgment: either accept and enforce, or appeal to the appellate or cassation courts within the prescribed windows. Each route has distinct strategic and financial considerations.
A judgment without enforcement is worthless. Enforcement in Egypt requires a precise grasp of attachment rules, service of process, and territorial jurisdiction.
Egyptian court judgments are enforced through bailiff offices and enforcement departments — attachment, auction, bankruptcy declaration. Needs a clear enforcement plan after judgment.
Under Egyptian Arbitration Law 27/1994, the award is filed with the Court of Appeal for recognition and enforcement. Challenge is limited to specific grounds of nullity.
The New York Convention guarantees enforcement of foreign awards in Egypt with narrow grounds for refusal. Competent forum: Cairo Court of Appeal or the governorate of enforcement.
Foreign judgments are subject to the Egyptian Code of Civil Procedure with a reciprocity requirement from the issuing country. Absent a reciprocity treaty, enforcement is more complex.
The largest category — supply, services, distribution, agency contracts. Outcome depends on the original drafting and respect for formal notices.
Disagreements on management, dividend distribution, minority-shareholder exclusion, share transfers. Clear shareholder agreements prevent most of these.
Unjustified termination, end-of-service gratuity, delayed wages, dismissal. Heard before specialised labour courts with simplified procedure.
Estimated tax assessments, VAT, customs disputes. Route: appeals committees → tax court → Supreme Administrative Court. Strict deadlines are decisive.
Challenging government decisions: licensing, land-allocation revocation, university decisions, syndicate decisions. The Council of State is the competent forum.
Trademark infringement, patent violation, unauthorised use of protected works. Heard before economic courts under specialised procedures.
Send a short brief of facts, parties, and critical dates — and we issue an early-case assessment within one Egyptian business day.