Start with the objective, not the forum
Some disputes require urgent protective relief or procedural pressure. Others call for structured negotiation that preserves the relationship. The first step is to define the objective before choosing the route.
Review the contract and evidence before taking a hard position
Position strength is not measured by instinct alone. It depends on what the documents show, how the contract was performed, and whether there is an arbitration clause, a competent court, or notice requirements.
Use litigation where coercive authority is central
Litigation may be the stronger route where coercive orders, formal evidence handling, or a clear court-based enforcement path are needed.
Use arbitration where the contract and the commercial objective support it
Arbitration is not always the best choice. It can, however, be suitable in complex or cross-border relationships, or where confidentiality, flexibility, and disciplined procedural management have real value.